NovaVel

Editors & Reviewers

Supporting Excellence in Scholarly Publishing

Editors and peer reviewers play a central role in maintaining the quality, integrity and credibility of scholarly publishing. NovaVel works with academic experts who contribute their knowledge and experience to the fair and rigorous evaluation of research.

Our Editorial Community

NovaVel's editorial community brings together researchers and subject specialists who support the scholarly development of our journals.

Editors are responsible for maintaining appropriate academic standards, overseeing peer review and making editorial decisions based on the scientific merit, relevance and suitability of submitted manuscripts.

Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions are based on scholarly considerations and are independent of commercial influence.

Research Integrity

Editors help safeguard the integrity of the scholarly record and address ethical concerns appropriately.

Fair Evaluation

Manuscripts should be evaluated objectively and without inappropriate discrimination or bias.

For Editors

Editors contribute to the scientific direction, quality and integrity of NovaVel journals.

Editor Guidelines
  • Assess manuscripts for suitability within the journal's aims and scope
  • Support fair and rigorous peer review
  • Select appropriately qualified reviewers
  • Maintain confidentiality throughout the editorial process
  • Identify and manage potential conflicts of interest
  • Evaluate reviewer recommendations objectively
  • Support research and publication integrity
  • Make decisions based on scholarly merit
  • Address ethical concerns appropriately
  • Help maintain the quality of the scholarly record

For Reviewers

Peer reviewers contribute specialist knowledge to the evaluation of scholarly research and provide constructive feedback that helps editors make informed decisions.

Expert Evaluation

Evaluate the scientific quality, methodology, originality and relevance of the manuscript.

Constructive Feedback

Provide clear, objective and constructive comments that can help authors improve their work.

Confidentiality

Treat manuscripts and associated information as confidential.

Impartiality

Disclose potential competing interests that could affect objective evaluation.

Timeliness

Accept review assignments only when the review can be completed appropriately within the requested timeframe.

The Peer Review Process

01Manuscript Submission
02Initial Editorial Assessment
03Editor Assignment
04Reviewer Selection
05Peer Review
06Editorial Evaluation
07Revision, where required
08Final Editorial Decision

Detailed peer-review procedures are provided in the applicable journal policy.

View Peer Review Policy

Editorial & Reviewer Ethics

Editors and reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality, disclose relevant competing interests, respect intellectual property and contribute to the fair and responsible evaluation of scholarly work.

Our Journal

Natural Products and Translational Medicine

Learn more about the editorial leadership and scholarly community supporting NPTM.

Contribute to Scholarly Publishing

Researchers with relevant subject expertise who are interested in contributing to NovaVel's editorial and peer-review activities may contact the publisher.